2000 AC Aceca vs. 1973 BMW 1502
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 1502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 1502 would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1973 BMW 1502. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 680 kg more than 1973 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 1502. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1973 BMW 1502 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | 1502 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1573 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |