2000 AC Aceca vs. 1974 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 440 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1974 Mazda 929 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |