2000 AC Aceca vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 375 kg more than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

2000 AC Aceca 1975 Mazda Cosmo
Make AC Mazda
Model Aceca Cosmo
Year Released 2000 1975
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3504 cc 2616 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 346 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 188 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1235 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2520 mm