2000 AC Aceca vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 815 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | AC | Suzuki |
Model | Aceca | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1940 mm |