2000 AC Aceca vs. 1977 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 340 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1977 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | Brougham |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3090 mm |