2000 AC Aceca vs. 1977 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 652 kg more than 1977 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1977 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | AC | Zastava |
Model | Aceca | 850 K |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |