2000 AC Aceca vs. 1981 Buick Electra

To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick Electra would be higher. At 4,129 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1981 Buick Electra. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1981 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Buick Electra weights approximately 82 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Buick Electra. (278 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Buick Electra.

Compare all specifications:

2000 AC Aceca 1981 Buick Electra
Make AC Buick
Model Aceca Electra
Year Released 2000 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3504 cc 4129 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 346 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 278 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 100.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 86.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1692 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 3030 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 95 L