2000 AC Aceca vs. 1982 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 915 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1982 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Aceca | Starlet |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 75 L |