2000 AC Aceca vs. 1983 Pininfarina Coupe
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Pininfarina Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Pininfarina Coupe would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe. (176 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1983 Pininfarina Coupe | |
| Make | AC | Pininfarina |
| Model | Aceca | Coupe |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2450 mm |
