2000 AC Aceca vs. 1984 Ford Tempo

To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 405 kg more than 1984 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications: