2000 AC Aceca vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 290 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | AC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Aceca | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2680 mm |