2000 AC Aceca vs. 1984 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1984 Opel Kadett. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Opel Kadett. (98 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1984 Opel Kadett | |
Make | AC | Opel |
Model | Aceca | Kadett |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2530 mm |