2000 AC Aceca vs. 1986 Chrysler Daytona
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1986 Chrysler Daytona | |
| Make | AC | Chrysler |
| Model | Aceca | Daytona |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 243 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
