2000 AC Aceca vs. 1988 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 460 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2842 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2580 mm |