2000 AC Aceca vs. 1989 Buick Regal
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 270 kg more than 1989 Buick Regal.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1989 Buick Regal | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Aceca | Regal |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2740 mm |
