2000 AC Aceca vs. 1991 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1991 Ford Fiesta | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | Fiesta |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2450 mm |
