2000 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1992 Acura Integra | |
| Make | AC | Acura |
| Model | Aceca | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2560 mm |
