2000 AC Aceca vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 390 kg more than 1993 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Aceca | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 168 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2620 mm |
