2000 AC Aceca vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 325 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | AC | Rover |
| Model | Aceca | 200 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
