2000 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Aceca | TL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2840 mm |