2000 AC Aceca vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 30 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Aceca | CL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |