2000 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Tracker |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2210 mm |