2000 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Ford Think
To start off, 2001 Ford Think is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2001 Ford Think. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Think. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 402 kg more than 2001 Ford Think. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Think, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Think. (183 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Think.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2001 Ford Think | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Think |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2730 mm |