2000 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2004 Marcos TS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2004 Marcos TS. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2004 Marcos TS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 535 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Marcos TS. (224 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Marcos TS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | AC | Marcos |
Model | Aceca | TS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2230 mm |