2000 AC Aceca vs. 2004 TVR T 350
To start off, 2004 TVR T 350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,605 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 346 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 510 kg more than 2004 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 TVR T 350. (393 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 TVR T 350.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2004 TVR T 350 | |
Make | AC | TVR |
Model | Aceca | T 350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 3605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 57 L |