2000 AC Aceca vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 30 kg more than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | DrifterX |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 82 L |