2000 AC Aceca vs. 2010 GMC Savana
To start off, 2010 GMC Savana is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2010 GMC Savana. (250 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2010 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Savana weights approximately 863 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Savana (623 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2010 GMC Savana | |
Make | AC | GMC |
Model | Aceca | Savana |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 623 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2473 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2073 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 117 L |