2000 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 109 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Aceca | XF |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |