2000 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | AC | Citroen |
Model | Aceca | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |