2000 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2011 Volvo XC90. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 545 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.
Because 2011 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC90 (420 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2011 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Aceca | XC90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |