2000 AC Aceca vs. 2012 BMW 328

To start off, 2012 BMW 328 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2012 BMW 328. (230 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 328 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 328.

Compare all specifications:

2000 AC Aceca 2012 BMW 328
Make AC BMW
Model Aceca 328
Year Released 2000 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3504 cc 2979 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 346 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 89.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 84 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1735 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4624 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1811 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1384 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 57 L