2000 AC Aceca vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 2012 BMW X5 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | X5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2933 mm |