2000 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 130 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | AC | Mini |
| Model | Aceca | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 47 L |
