2000 AC Cobra vs. 1953 Renault Juva
To start off, 2000 AC Cobra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1953 Renault Juva. (20 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1953 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Renault Juva weights approximately 48 kg more than 2000 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Cobra (400 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Renault Juva. (45 Nm). This means 2000 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Renault Juva.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 1953 Renault Juva | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Cobra | Juva |
Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 45 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 54.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 948 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2360 mm |