2000 AC Cobra vs. 1966 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2000 AC Cobra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Cobra (350 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Cobra weights approximately 355 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 1966 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | AC | Alpine |
Model | Cobra | A 110 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 95 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |