2000 AC Cobra vs. 1985 Citroen CX
To start off, 2000 AC Cobra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX.
Because 2000 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 1985 Citroen CX | |
Make | AC | Citroen |
Model | Cobra | CX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3100 mm |