2000 AC Cobra vs. 1985 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 AC Cobra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Sable weights approximately 340 kg more than 2000 AC Cobra.
Because 2000 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 1985 Mercury Sable | |
Make | AC | Mercury |
Model | Cobra | Sable |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2512 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2700 mm |