2000 AC Cobra vs. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 919 more horse power than 2000 AC Cobra. (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2000 AC Cobra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 AC Cobra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | AC | SSC |
Model | Cobra | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 1269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6075 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1090 mm |