2000 AC Cobra vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Cobra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Cobra (350 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2011 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Cobra (400 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2000 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Cobra | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Cobra | UTE |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
