2000 AC Cobra vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Cobra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 558 kg more than 2000 AC Cobra.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | AC | Mini |
Model | Cobra | Countryman |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |