2000 Acura Integra vs. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 2000 Acura Integra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura Integra (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura Integra weights approximately 45 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura Integra. (177 Nm). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura Integra | 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
Make | Acura | Austin-Healey |
Model | Integra | Tickford |
Year Released | 2000 | 1957 |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 184 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2600 mm |