2000 Acura Integra vs. 1992 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Acura Integra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,408 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1992 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1992 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura Integra | 1992 Opel Omega | |
Make | Acura | Opel |
Model | Integra | Omega |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |