2000 Acura Integra vs. 1997 Jeep Icon
To start off, 2000 Acura Integra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Icon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Icon would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Icon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Jeep Icon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jeep Icon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1997 Jeep Icon has manual transmission. 1997 Jeep Icon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura Integra | 1997 Jeep Icon | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | Integra | Icon |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2380 mm |