2000 Acura MDX vs. 1969 Bristol 410
To start off, 2000 Acura MDX is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura MDX (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1969 Bristol 410. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 1969 Bristol 410.
Because 2000 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Bristol 410. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 410 (463 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura MDX. (346 Nm). This means 1969 Bristol 410 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura MDX | 1969 Bristol 410 | |
Make | Acura | Bristol |
Model | MDX | 410 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 463 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2910 mm |