2000 Acura MDX vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Acura MDX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura MDX (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2000 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura MDX (346 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2000 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura MDX | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | MDX | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2430 mm |