2000 Acura MDX vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura MDX would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (311 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Acura MDX. (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Acura MDX.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC90 (440 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura MDX. (346 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura MDX | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | MDX | XC90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5850 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2860 mm |