2000 Acura MDX vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura MDX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Acura MDX. (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Acura MDX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura MDX (346 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2000 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura MDX | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | MDX | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 302 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2880 mm |