2000 Acura NSX vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 395 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 380 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 1951 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Acura | Allard |
| Model | NSX | K2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
