2000 Acura NSX vs. 1959 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 437 more horse power than 1959 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 465 kg more than 1959 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Munga. (79 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 1959 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Acura | DKW |
| Model | NSX | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2010 mm |
