2000 Acura NSX vs. 1960 Holden FC
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 418 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 595 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 1960 Holden FC | |
| Make | Acura | Holden |
| Model | NSX | FC |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2670 mm |
